0% Proof

The recent announcement of prison reforms by David Cameron included an innovation which will be despised by many prisoners but which I myself warmly welcome: The introduction of alcohol detector tags for those on parole.

I am not in prison because of drink. That is, drink is not responsible for me being in prison, I am. However, drink was one of a number of factors which impaired my thinking, judgement, and decision making in life before prison, leading eventually to my conviction. Due to the fact that being ‘drunk’ was not the cause of me coming to prison, I have always been told that it is unlikely that, upon release, my parole license will have a no alcohol condition. I specifically asked if one could be put on at my own request, to give me extra encouragement to avoid alcohol, but was told that this would not be done because, bizarrely, they “cannot impose a license condition not to consume alcohol, only not to enter premises licensed to sell it, and that would mean not even going to the supermarket”. That didn’t sound right to me, but I had to accept what I was told and avoid alcohol once I am released by my own determination alone.

The announcement that parolees will be banned from drinking alcohol and fitted with tags which can detect it by monitoring perspiration therefore comes as a pleasant surprise to me. It is exactly what I have been hoping for.

2 thoughts on “0% Proof

  1. It’s a pitty you dudley do right, did’nt think of avoiding alcohol earlier, parole should be abolished and guys like you should serve your full sentence

    • I agree that it is a pity that I didn’t recognise the effect that drinking and other things had upon my decision making when I was a child. Unfortunately that is the nature of such things as drink problems. At the time they don’t feel like a problem at all. They feel like the solution. As for your suggestion that parole should be abolished and guys like me serving the full sentence, I’m afraid this highlights a misnunderstanding of our justice system. There are some sentences (such as the IPP and discretionary life sentence) which have been imposed on thousands of people not necessarily because of the seriousness of their crimes but simply as a precautionary measure to ensure the parole board only release them when they have been rehabilitated. If parole were abolished these people would spend the rest of their lives in prison regardless of the fact that they may have rehabilitated themselves and be ready and able to reintegrate and give something back to society. Surely you aren’t saying that someone who got a precautionary IPP sentence for a teeenage burglary should die in jail?

Leave a Reply to Johnnyo Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s